News Blog

FFIPP: Internationals Palestinians and Israelis Working in Solidarity for a Complete End of Occupation and Just Peace

December 10, 2010.

A year ago tonight, on International Human Rights Day, our apartment
in Ramallah was broken into by the Israeli military in the middle of
the night and I was torn away from my wife Majida, my daughters Luma
and Layan, and my son Laith, who at the time was only nine months
old.

As the coordinator of the Bil'in Popular Committee against the Wall
and Settlements I was convicted of "organizing illegal demonstrations"
and "incitement."

The "illegal demonstrations" refer to the nonviolent
resistance campaign that my village has been waging for the last six
years against Israel's Apartheid Wall that is being built on our
land.

I find it strange that the military judges could call our
demonstrations illegal and charge me for participating in and
organizing them after the world's highest legal body, the
International Court of Justice in The Hague, has ruled that Israel's
wall within the occupied territories is illegal and must be
dismantled. Even the Israeli supreme court ruled that the Wall's route
in Bil'in is illegal.



I have been accused of inciting violence: this charge is also
puzzling. If the check points, closures, ongoing land theft, wall and
settlements, night raids into our homes and violent oppression of our
protests does not incite violence, what does?



Despite the occupations constant and intense incitement to violence in
Bil'in, we have chosen another way. We have chosen to protest
nonviolently together with Israeli and International supporters. We
 have chosen to carry a message of hope and real partnership between
Palestinians and Israelis in the face of oppression and injustice. It 
is this message that the Occupation is attempting to crush through its
various institutions including the military courts. An official from
the Israeli Military Prosecution shamelessly told my Attorney, Gaby
Lasky, that the objective of the military in my prosecution is to "put
an end" to these demonstrations.



The crime of incitement that I have been convicted of is defined under
Israeli military decree 101 regarding the prohibition of hostile
action of propaganda and incitement as "The attempt, verbally or
otherwise, to influence public opinion in the Area in a way that may
disturb the public peace or public order" and carries a 10 year
maximal sentence. This definition is so broad and vague that it can be
applied to almost any action or statement. Actually, these words
could be considered incitement if they were spoken in the occupied
territories.



On the 11th of October of this year I was sentenced to 12 months in
prison, plus 6 months suspended sentence for 3 years, and a fine. My
family and I, especially my daughters, were counting the days to my
release. The military prosecution waited until just a few days before
the end of my sentence before appealing against my release, arguing
that I should be imprisoned longer. I have completed my sentence but
remain in prison. Though international law considers myself and other
activists as human rights defenders, the occupation authorities
consider us criminals whose freedom and other rights must be denied.


In the year that I have spent in prison, the demonstrations in Bil'in,
Naalin, Al Maasara, and Beit Omar have continued. Nabi Saleh and other
villages have taken up the popular struggle. Within this year, the
 International campaign calling for Boycott Divestment and Sanctions of 
Israel until it complies with International law has grown
considerably, as have legal actions against Israeli war crimes. I hope
that soon Israel will no longer be able to ignore the clear
condemnation of its policies coming from around the world.

In the year that I have spent in prison, my son Laith has taken his
first steps and said his first words,  and Luma and Layan have been
growing from children to beautiful young girls. I have not been able
to be with them, to walk holding their hands, to take them to school
as they and I are used to. Laith does not know me now. And my wife
Majida has had to care for our family alone.

In

2010 children in Bil'in and throughout the West bank are still
being awakened in the middle of the night to find guns pointed at
their heads. In the year that I have spent in prison, the military has
carried out dozens of night raids in Bil'in with the purpose of
removing those involved in the popular struggle against the
occupation.



Imagine if heavily armed men forced their way into your home in the
middle of the night. If your children were forced to watch as their
father or brother was blindfolded, handcuffed, and taken away. Or if
you as a parent were forced to watch this being done to your child.



This week the door of our cell was opened and a sixteen year boy was
pushed inside. My friend Adeeb Abu Rahmeh was shocked to recognize his
son, Mohammed, whom Adeeb had not seen since he himself was arrested
during a nonviolent demonstration 16 months ago.



Mohammad smiled when he saw his Father, but his face was red and
swollen and it was clear that he was in pain. He told us that he had
been taken from his home two nights previously. He spent the first
night blindfolded and shackled, being moved from one place to another.
 The next day after a terrifying, disoriented, and sleepless night he
was taken to an interrogation room, his blindfold was removed and an
interrogator showed him pictures of people from the village. When
 questioned about the first picture he told the interrogator that he
did not recognize the person. The interrogator slapped him hard across
the face. This continued with every question that Mohammad was asked:
when he did not give the answer that the interrogator wanted, he was
slapped, punched and threatened. Mohammad's treatment is not
unusual.



Young boys from our village have been taken from their homes violently
and report   being denied sleep, food, and water and being kept in
Isolation and threatened and often beaten during interrogation.



What was unusual about Mohammad is that he did not satisfy his
interrogator and with competent representation was released within a
few days. Usually children, just because they are children, will say
whatever the interrogator wants them to say to make such treatment
stop.  Adeeb, myself, and thousands of other prisoners are being held
in prison based on testimonies forced or coerced out of these
children. No child should ever receive such treatment.



When the children who had testified against me retracted what they
said in interrogation and told the military judge that their
testimonies where given under duress, the judge declared them hostile
witnesses.



Adeeb Abu Rahmah and I are the first to be convicted with incitement
and participation in illegal demonstrations since the first Intifada
but, unfortunately, it does not seem that we will be the last.



I often wonder what Israeli leaders think they will achieve if they
succeed in their goal of suppressing the Palestinian popular struggle?
Is it possible that they believe that our people can sit quietly and
watch as our land is taken from us?  Do they think that we can face
our children and tell them that, like us, they will never experience
freedom? Or do they actually prefer violence and killing to our form
of nonviolent struggle because it camouflages their ongoing theft and
gives them an excuse to continue using us as guinea pigs for their
 weapons?



My eldest daughter Luma was nine years old when I was arrested. She is
now ten. After my arrest she began going to the Friday demonstrations
in our village. She always carries a picture of me in her arms. The
adults try to look after her but I still  worry for my little girl. I
wish that she could enjoy her childhood like other children, that she
could be studying and playing with her friends. But through the walls
and barbed wire that separates us I hear my daughter's message to me,
saying: "Baba, they cannot stop us. If they take you away, we will
take your place and continue to struggle for justice." This is the
message that I want to bring you today. From beyond the walls, the
barbed wire, and the prison bars that separate Palestinians and 
Israelis.


December 3, 2010. The court will hear the Military prosecution's appeal to harshen Abdallah Abu Rahmah's sentence. Abu Rahmah was supposed to be released on November 18th, but was kept in detention to the military prosecution's request, despite having finished serving his term.
What: Appeal hearing in Abdallah Abu Rahmah's case.
 Where: Military Court of Appeals, Ofer compound.
 When: 2:30 PM, Monday, December 6th.
Media Contact: Jonathan Pollak +972-54-632-7736.
After ordering to keep Abdallah Abu Rahmah in detention past his release date on the 18th last month, the Military Court of appeals will hear the prosecution's appeal demanding to aggravate the one-year sentence imposed on Abu Rahmah. The prosecution is asking the court to harshen the sentence so that it exceeds two years imprisonment.


Abu Rahmah in court

Despite international outrage over the mishandling of Abu Rahmah, the prosecution openly argues that the sentence should be extended for political reasons, namely "to serve as deterrence not only to [Abu Rahmah] himself, but also to others who may follow in his footsteps." Abdallah Abu Rahmah served as the coordinator of the Bil'in Popular Committee Against the Wall and Settlements, until his arrest last year. Such arguments by the prosecution expose the real motivation behind the countless arrests of anti-Wall organizers and activists recently, which is to squash the popular struggle movement in the West Bank .
Last month, on October 11th, Abu Rahmah was sentenced to twelve months imprisonment for his prominent role in his village's successful campaign against the construction of Israel 's Separation Barrier on its lands. Abu Rahmah was convicted of two Freedom of Expression charges - incitement and organizing illegal demonstrations, but was cleared of all charges connecting him with direct violence.
Abu Rahmah was to be released from prison on November 18th, when the prison term he was sentenced to ended, but was kept in jail on the order of the Military Court of Appeals. The controversial decision directly conflicts with the jurisprudence of the Israeli Hight Court on the issue, instructing that a prisoner should only be kept under arrest after his term was over in the most extenuating of circumstances.
Abu Rahmah was declared a human rights defender by the European Union, and his conviction and sentence generated international outrage, and was denounced by human rights organizations and the international community alike, including EU foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton.
Background
Abu Rahmah, the coordinator of the Bil'in Popular Committee Against the Wall and Settlements, was arrested last year by soldiers who raided his home at the middle of the night and was subsequently indicted before an Israeli military court on unsubstantiated charges that included stone-throwing and arms possession. Abu Rahmah was cleared of both the stone-throwing and arms possession charges, but convicted of organizing illegal demonstrations and incitement.
An exemplary case of mal-use of the Israeli military legal system in the West Bank for the purpose of silencing legitimate political dissent, Abu Rahmah's conviction was subject to harsh international criticism. The EU foreign policy chief, Catherine Ashton, expressed her deep concern "that the possible imprisonment of Mr Abu Rahma is intended to prevent him and other Palestinians from exercising their legitimate right to protest[...]", after EU diplomats attended all hearings in Abu Rahmah's case. Ashton's statement was followed by one from the Spanish Parliament.
Renowned South African human right activist, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, called on Israel to overturn Abu Rahmah's conviction on behalf of the Elders, a group of international public figures noted as elder statesmen, peace activists, and human rights advocates, brought together by Nelson Mandela. Members of the Elders, including Tutu, have met with Abu Rahmah on their visit to Bil'in prior to his arrest.
International human rights organization Amnesty International condemned Abu Rahmah's conviction as an assault on the right to freedom of expression. Human Rights Watch denounced the conviction, pronouncing the whole process "an unfair trial".
Israeli organizations also distributed statements against the conviction – including a statement by B’Tselem, which raises the issue of questionable testimonies by minors used to convict Abu Rahme, and The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) which highlights the impossibility of organizing legal demonstrations for Palestinians in the West Bank .
Legal Background
Abu Rahmah, the coordinator of the Bil'in Popular Committee Against the Wall and Settlements, was acquitted of two out of the four charges brought against him in the indictment - stone-throwing and a ridiculous and vindictive arms possession charge. According to the indictment, Abu Rahmah collected used tear-gas projectiles and bullet casings shot at demonstrators, with the intention of exhibiting them to show the violence used against demonstrators. This absurd charge is a clear example of how eager the military prosecution is to use legal procedures as a tool to silence and smear unarmed dissent.
The court did, however, find Abu Rahmah guilty of two of the most draconian anti-free speech articles in military legislation: incitement, and organizing and participating in illegal demonstrations. It did so based only on testimonies of minors who were arrested in the middle of the night and denied their right to legal counsel, and despite acknowledging significant ills in their questioning.
The court was also undeterred by the fact that the prosecution failed to provide any concrete evidence implicating Abu Rahmah in any way, despite the fact that the army systematically films all demonstrations in Bil'in.
Under military law, incitement is defined as "The attempt, verbally or otherwise, to influence public opinion in the Area in a way that may disturb the public peace or public order" (section 7(a) of the Order Concerning Prohibition of Activities of Incitement and Hostile Propaganda (no.101), 1967), and carries a 10 years maximal sentence.


 

FFIPP International Festival: Art for Peace! Art for Freedom!

Thursday the 18th November at 20.00 pm at the Crea Cafe (Universiteit van Amsterdam):
Turfdraagsterpad 17
1012 XT Amsterdam
020 5251400

The Faculty for Israeli-Palestinian Peace – Netherlands (FFIPP-NL) is organizing an international festival with the theme Art in the Conflict – Art for Peace! Art for Freedom! And will deal with the issue of ‘Art as a means of dialogue?’ – A way to create means of exchange and understanding between Israelis and Palestinians.

Art and culture can play a key-role in armed conflict situations. Art can inspire people to enter into heated debates and perhaps gradually open the way towards a just peace. During this evening with interactive events and a conference with an Israeli and a Palestinian speaker, the audience will be presented with a view on how art is able – or unable – to play an active role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


The event in Amsterdam will take place on the 18th November and present:
• A Conference by Israeli and Palestinian speakers
• A photo exhibition of art on both sides of the Israeli West Bank separation barrier
• Movie screening of “Arna’s Children”, with a discussion session via Skype with director Juliano Mer Khamis
• To conclude the evening: A special musical performance by MANU – to see more: http://www.manu-music.com/
The Palestinian speaker will be Tayseer Al Khateb, from The Freedom Theatre in Jenin refugee camp in the West Bank. The Freedom Theatre tries to give children a future by training them in theatre acting and performance. To read more go to: http://www.thefreedomtheatre.org/
Their work has inspired the celebrated movie ‘Arna’s children’ directed by Juliano Mer Khamis.
The Israeli speaker will be Tal Ben Zvi from the School of Arts of the Kibbutzim College in Tel Aviv, Israel. She is also a curator at several art galleries and is involved in peace activism and dialogue.  During the conference the speakers will critically discuss the possibility of art as a means of dialogue for peace.
When & Where:
The event in Amsterdam will take place on Thursday the 18th November at 20.00 pm at the Crea Cafe (Universiteit van Amsterdam):
Turfdraagsterpad 17
1012 XT Amsterdam
020 5251400

More information: FFIPP-Netherlands


 

Invitation au vernissage de l'exposition

Des deux côtés du Mur :
Une perspective artistique du mur de séparation entre Israël et la Palestine

Lundi 15 novembre à 18h00
Sciences Po Paris
13 rue de l’Université 75007 Paris

À l’occasion de la semaine de la Solidarité internationale, FFIPP-France et FFIPP-Netherlands vous donnent rendez-vous du 13 au 21 novembre 2010 pour « Art for Peace! Art for Freedom! », une série d’évènements destinés à apporter un éclairage original et innovant sur le conflit au Proche-Orient. Le vernissage de l'exposition « Des deux côtés du Mur: Une perspective artistique du mur de séparation entre Israël et la Palestine » marquera le coup d'envoi de cette programmation.

Suivi de la conférence de Mme Tal Ben Zvi, Directrice de l’école d’art du Kibbutzim College of Education de Tel Aviv, et de Mr Tayseer Al Khateb, du «Freedom Theatre» de Jenine, Professeur d’anthropologie et de sociologie à l’Université de Haïfa

Le programme complet de «Art for Peace! Art for Freedom! » dans les villes de Paris, Grenoble et Amsterda est disponible sur:
www.ffipp-france.com and FFIPP-Netherlands : www.ffippnl.wordpress.com

Pour toute demande d'informations:
contact@ffipp-france.com
 


 

Living under occupation surrounded by expanding illegal Israeli settlements: Building bridges of understanding, reconciliation, and peace

Daoud Nassar is a Palestinian Christian farmer from Nahalin, a village near Bethlehem which is surrounded by the illegal Israeli settlements of Bitar Iliet, Gevaot, Rosh Zurim, El'azar, Efrat, and Neve Daniel.

In spite of the immense obstacles and violence that Daoud, his wife Jihan, and their children are facing every day from the Israeli occupation army and settlers, Daoud's family is committed to positive actions to improve their lives and the lives of their neighbors. To this end, they have established a community center for women in the village, as well as an organization called the Tent of Nations, which brings youth from various cultures together to build bridges of understanding, reconciliation, and peace.

Daoud Nassar will speak in following campuses:

November 8:
Hampshire College, Faculty Lounge in Franklin Patterson Hall from 1-2pm

Amherst College, 7:00 pm in the building Fayerweather on the Amherst campus, room number 113

Greenfield Community College

UMASS Amherst

November 9:

Brandeis University, 11-12:30 MPR room in shapiro campus center

November 10:

Macalester College, 12:00-1:00 pm at the Weyerhaeuser Board Room

University of Minnesota, 3:30-5:00 pm at the Honeywell Auditorium (Carlton L-110)

Information about the Tent of Nations
Interview with Jihan and Daoud Nassar


Summer 2011 Internship for Human Rights and Just Peace in Palestine/Israel

Dates: June 24 - July 30

For college and university students only.
Intensive, on the ground, eye opening learning experience about the conflict in Palestine/Israel and the struggle for Human Rights Justice, and Peace.
The program includes a week-long orientation course and one month of volunteer work in Palestinian and Israeli grassroots organizations, research centers, universities, and human rights organizations.

Summer 2010 FFIPP interns at the Holocaust Memorial/Museum in Jerusalem

The Orientation course introduces students to the following  topics: Pre 1917 Palestine, Palestine under British Mandate, Zionism, the Holocaust,  the Nakba, Refugees, 1967 Occupation, Palesinian national movement, Palestinian community inside Israel, Jerusalem and grass roots activisim for human rights, justice and peace in Palestine/Israel.

Past Orientation courses included visits to Jaffa, Jerusalem, Haifa, Bethlehem, Bilin, Ramallah, Tel-Aviv, Kafr Bir'im (destroyed 1948 village), Kibbutz Lohamei HaGetaot,  al-Ghabisiyya (destroyed 1948 village), Nazareth, Beit Omar, Um el Faham, Dheisheh refugee camp, Hebron, Suba (destroyed 1948 village) Jericho and settlements around Jerusalem.
The program is open to all students anywhere in the world. Students  in the  fields of English as Second language, Music, Theatre, Arts, Communication, Photography, Computer science, Health, Women empowerment, and Community Development are invited to apply. We also encourage students who major in Political Science, History of the Middle East, and International relations, to apply.

Summer 2010 FFIPP interns in Bilin

More information


October 7, 2010, The Palestine Center, Washington, DC

Dr. Rashid Khalidi

Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies, Columbia University

A number of factors played a part in cementing support for Zionism and later for the state of Israel of its two primary international sponsors: Great Britain and the United States.  As you know, each of them in its own era was the greatest power of its time.  In winning over the British and American political classes and their respective publics to the cause of Zionism and to the cause of Israel, a crucial role was played by scholarly and non-academic writings, and later by the cinema and other media. I think it’s insufficiently recognized that establishing the hegemony of Zionism in the field of ideas in an Anglo-American academic and public discourse was a vital precondition for its successes in the political and diplomatic arenas. The discursive victories of Zionism preceded its triumphs in the chancelleries of the world and on the battlefields, and the latter would never have occurred, in my opinion, but for the former. In other words, in addition to being successful as an idea, as a national movement, and as a colonial settler phenomenon, political Zionism has always been a resounding public relations triumph...

View lecture
 

September 26, 2010

Lynne Segal, is a Professor of Psychology and Gender Studies, Birkbeck College, University of London and a member of the board of FFIPP-I.  She wrote to Dr. Eyad Sarraj, the psychiatrist and founder of the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme in Gaza, to inquire about his opinion regarding the Jewish boat to Gaza.
Following is his answer. Dr. Eyad Sarraj is the president of FFIPP-I

Dear Lynne,
You write to me, and I must tell you that I am very inspired by the coming voyage of a Jewish boat to break the siege on Gaza. I have helped and worked with and received other boats, but this is the most significant one for me, because it carries such an important message. It brings to us and tells the world that those we Palestinians should hate as our enemies can instead arrive as our friends, our brothers and sisters, sharing a love for humanity and for our struggle for justice and peace. I will wait with anticipation to shake hands with them and hold them dear in close embrace. They are my heroes.
 
Please, never despair that you cannot bring peace, and never give up work for a just world. When I see, read, and relate to Jews who believe in me as an equal human being, and who tell me that their definition of humanity is not complete without me, I become stronger in my quest for justice and peace. I learnt long ago that there are Jews in and outside Israel who belong with me in the camp of friends of justice and peace. I have always strongly believed that we can live together, that we must live together. We have no other choice except to live together. It is because of people like you, and events like this, that I will never give up on the hope.
With my best and warmest

Eyad Sarraj
Gaza, Palestine


A Campaign calling TIAA-CREF to divest from firms that supply the Israeli military and support illegal Jewish settlements companies

Eighty faculty members at the University of Massachusett-Boston recently signed a letter to TIAA-CREF’s CEO, Charles Ferguson, asking TIAA-CREF divest from companies profiting from the occupation. See the exchange between the faculty representative and Mr. Ferguson following his public address on campus.


Leader of Protests on Unlawful Land Confiscation Faces 20 Years in Jail

September 8, 2010
 
An Israeli military court's conviction of Abdullah Abu Rahme, an advocate of nonviolent protests against Israel's de facto confiscation of land from the West Bank village of Bil'in, raises grave due process concerns, Human Rights Watch said today. On August 24, 2010, Abu Rahme, who has been detained for more than eight months, was convicted on charges of organizing and participating in illegal demonstrations and inciting protestors to damage the separation barrier, throw stones at Israeli soldiers, and participate in violent protests.

Full Article.

By Mohammed Khatib, Bili'n,  September 2, 2010


Abdallah Abu Rahmah with Desmond Tutu,  Mary Robinson and President Carter in Bili'n at the grave of Bassem Abu Rahma.

Source: The Electronic Intifada

When I was a boy I was still allowed to travel in Israel. I went to the beach and swam in the sea, something that most Palestinian children living in the West Bank today can only dream of. Israel has been restricting movement more and more over the years. We Palestinians were banned from traveling to Israel, the land where many of our parents were born. And now I find I cannot leave the West Bank. I was stopped from leaving the country on 4 August when I tried to cross the Allenby Bridge and reach Jordan in order to fly to Europe.


Powered by Drupal - Design by ChameleonIllustration.com